A 'Mans Magazine' has offered loads of money to ruth Kelly to pose nude. Should she do it ?

I'd be grateful if the cretin that objected to this question yesterday would kindly allow me to ask it.
We can do without pompous people appointing themselves as censors !

Email me with details of which one so I can cancel my order.
That's one ugly woman.

Yeh if she really is desperate for the money. But with her determination, why has she given up like this?

whose ruth kelly?

Depends on which "men's magazine." If it's "Perfect 10" or "Playboy," she should consider it. Any other one is too objectionable.

It would be a better idea to offer her loads of money to keep her clothes ON, the patronising, holier-than-thou b i t ch !

Kelly?What is her last time?Well if she is a role model to many young girls then I really don't think she should.Like Baby V (Vannessa Hudgens)did.Baby V really shouldn't have done that,I completeley understand V's side of the story and no one else's.I don't think she should have done that because now many little girls who just adore her are now well...acting different thinking stuff like that is ok.So Kelly shouldnt do that if she is a role model to many YOUNG little girls.If not I say hey,if she wants to why not?But if she is a role model I don't want what happened to V to whatever Kelly u r tALKING ABOUT.But hey this is just my opinion.I'm just saying this because think little girls can get into mags like that and they may even adore that girl untill the pic.Well just saying they could get the mag anytime and place,anywhere!Ok well good luck I guess!